NBA Finals Game 3: Over Before You Knew It

Robert Mayer-USA TODAY Sports

Less than halfway through the second quarter, Game 3 was already over.

As John Schuhmann tweeted, in the first frame the Spurs exploded for 41 points in 23 possession -- on pace to score 178 points per 100 possessions, an absurd offensive efficiency rating relative to league averages and human decency. The Spurs dictated the style of play almost from the jump and Kawhi Leonard (with Danny Green as his sidekick) led the way by aggressively driving the ball to the rim and decisively rising up for his outside shot after the defense softened.

When both teams are at their best, the Spurs motion O is a perfect foil to the Heat's trappy D: San Antonio flows quickly from one action into the next, each player cutting constantly as the ball whips around, in search of the open man; on the other side of the ball, the Heat fly all over the court chaotically, disrupting pick-and-roll ball-handlers and then rotating to fill any openings as if each player were part of an amoeba.

Unfortunately for Heat fans, the Spurs couldn't miss and Miami played bad interior defense a few too many times to compete in the first half.

After Kawhi knocked down another jump shot -- a contested 21-footer -- with 8:08 left in the first half, the Spurs went ahead 55 to 30. Spoelstra called a timeout and I wondered if he might pull a Popovich: pack it in, sit his starters and get ready for Game 4.

It felt like both a reasonable and ridiculous proposition: trotting out bench-warmers with so much of the game left to play -- but shouldn't Spo consider it since the statistical likelihood of actually coming back was, at best, remote?

At that point in the game-- down 25 with more than half of the second quarter still to play -- if all things were equal (read: if the Spurs and Heat were two evenly-matched teams playing on a neutral court without the pressure of the Finals influencing the outcome), the Heat only had a 4.8 percent probability (per Inpredictable's NBA Win Probability Calculator) to comeback and win it. That's crazy! Almost two-thirds of game still left to be played and the Heat didn't have a chance!

Of course, all things were not equal: the Heat have what Clark Kellog would call, "high spurtability" -- capable of scoring quickly and in bunches -- and they also have the best player in the game on their squad.

Plus, considering Spo has played Lebron about 4,000 minutes every year (regular and postseason combined) since LBJ took his talents to South Beach in 2010 (save the lockout-shortened 2011-12 campaign when Spo, try as he might, could not overplay James because he didn't have enough games to work with), I figured the Big Three would be fighting it out for at least a little while longer.

And the Heat almost made their coach look like a genius, rallying in the third behind Dwyane Wade and an inspired American Airlines Arena crowd, cutting the Spurs' lead to 7 off of Norris Cole reverse layup with two minutes left in the quarter. That was the closest the team would get in the second half and even then, their win probability only climbed to 23.4 percent. On the very next play, Marco Belinelli hit a big three and pushed the lead back to double-digits; after that, the Heat win probability continued to drop more or less without incident until the clock hit double zeroes.

I can hear the critics now: This argument is stupid because anything could have happened and you don't play games on paper -- or more accurately -- you don't play games on a calculator...unless you're in the back of math class -- zing! But the numbers said that the Heat at halftime, down by 21, had less than a 4 percent chance of coming back and then -- to no one's surprise except Frank Isola -- math won and Miami lost.

Even if you somehow think Spo made the right decision refusing to concede victory and keeping in his best players until the bitter end (he didn't), look at the Heat's current predicament: they lost by 19 points (111 to 92) and LeBron played almost 40 minutes -- the most of anyone in the game.

At some point earlier than he did -- maybe not in the second quarter, but before the 1:36 mark of the fourth -- in order to save James's legs, Spoelstra should have thrown in the towel, waved the white flag or performed some other not yet realized act of surrender (ceremonially smash 90 coconuts, mayhaps?). But he didn't and now -- with only a day's rest -- this older Heat team needs to muster the wherewithal to once again follow up a playoff loss with a win. If only he had smashed the coconuts...

This is a fan-created post on The opinions here are not necessarily those shared by the editorial staff at Hot Hot Hoops.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Hot Hot Hoops

You must be a member of Hot Hot Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hot Hot Hoops. You should read them.

Join Hot Hot Hoops

You must be a member of Hot Hot Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hot Hot Hoops. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.